prerequisite that the content of the dream be known before interpretation can be made (cf. 2:5–7, 9, 26). So Daniel first describes the dream itself to the king (2:31–36a) and then gives the interpretation of it (2:36b–45). Both the description of the dream’s content and the interpretation are divinely inspired, having been “revealed” or “made known” to Daniel by God. The seer’s concluding statement of the interpretation in 2:45 emphasizes this point. Thus, there is a God-given communication to man
Page 14